Wind turbine gearbox material selection guide: 34CrNiMo6 vs 18CrNiMo7-6
In the material selection of wind turbine gearboxes, 34CrNiMo6 and 18CrNiMo7-6 are two commonly used alloy structural steels, each with its own applicable scenarios. The following is a comparative analysis from multiple dimensions, and selection suggestions are provided:
1. Comparison of chemical composition
| Materials | Carbon (C) | Chromium (Cr) | Nickel (Ni) | Molybdenum (Mo) | Other elements |
| 34CrNiMo6 | 0.30-0.38% | 1.3-1.7% | 1.3-1.7% | 0.15-0.3% | Manganese (Mn), Silicon (Si), etc. |
| 18CrNiMo7-6 | 0.15-0.21% | 1.5-1.8% | 1.4-1.7% | 0.25-0.35% | Manganese (Mn), Silicon (Si), etc. |
Key differences: 34CrNiMo6 has a significantly higher carbon content, suitable for high strength requirements; 18CrNiMo7-6 has a lower carbon content but slightly higher nickel and molybdenum content, which improves toughness.
2. Mechanical properties comparison
| Materials | Tensile strength (MPa) | Yield strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Impact toughness (J) | Hardness (HB) after quenching and tempering |
| 34CrNiMo6 Steel | 1000-1200 | 800-1000 | 10-12 | 40-60 | 290-330 |
| 18CrNiMo7-6 Steel | 850-1000 | 650-850 | 12-15 | 60-80 | 270-320 |
Advantageous scenarios:
- 34CrNiMo6: high load, static or low impact environment (such as low-speed heavy-load gears in the main gearbox).
- 18CrNiMo7-6: medium load, high impact or high toughness environment (such as high-speed gears, planetary gears).
3. Comparison of heat treatment and processing performance
- Heat treatment:
– Both require quenching and tempering (quenching + high temperature tempering), but 34CrNiMo6 requires a higher tempering temperature to balance strength and toughness.
-18CrNiMo7-6 is suitable for carburizing (surface hardening + tough core), suitable for gears that require wear-resistant surface. - Processability:
-18CrNiMo7-6 is easier to cut (low carbon content); pay attention to tool wear when processing 34CrNiMo6. - Weldability:
-Both require preheating and post-treatment, 18CrNiMo7-6 is slightly better.
4. Application scenario comparison
- 34CrNiMo6:
– Applicable: low-speed heavy-load gears (such as main shaft gears), high static load parts.
– Not applicable: high impact or low temperature environment. - 18CrNiMo7-6:
– Applicable: high-speed gears, parts with large impact loads (such as planetary gears), carburized gears (such as tooth surfaces requiring high hardness).
– Not applicable: extremely heavy loads and no need for surface hardening.
5. Cost and supply comparison
- Cost: 18CrNiMo7-6 is usually more expensive due to its slightly higher nickel and molybdenum content.
- Supply: Both are standard grades, but regional supply stability needs to be considered.
Material Selection suggestions
- High load + low impact: Choose 34CrNiMo6 (such as main drive gears).
- Medium load + impact/toughness requirements: Choose 18CrNiMo7-6 (such as high-speed gears or carburized gears).
- Low temperature environment: 18CrNiMo7-6 is preferred (high and low temperature toughness).
- Cost sensitivity: If strength allows, 34CrNiMo6 may be more economical.
Additional considerations
- Surface treatment: If carburizing/nitriding is required, 18CrNiMo7-6 is better.
- Fatigue life: Choose 34CrNiMo6 for high cycle fatigue; choose 18CrNiMo7-6 for impact fatigue.
- Industry trend: In wind power gearboxes, 18CrNiMo7-6 is often used for carburized gears, and 34CrNiMo6 is often used directly after quenching and tempering.
By comprehensively considering working conditions, costs and process requirements, material selection can be optimized to ensure the reliability and economy of gearboxes.
Interactive topic: Which material do you prioritize when manufacturing wind turbine gearboxes? Welcome to discuss with us further.
MORE ABOUT OUR 34CrNiMo6 & 18crnimo7-6 products
